See our Patterns Dictionary for other patterns.
Check our CandleScanner software and start trading candlestick patterns!
Forecast: bullish continuation
Trend prior to the pattern: uptrend
Opposite pattern: Falling Window
Remark: in particular cases the pattern may act as a bullish reversal pattern if prior its occurrence market was in a downtrend.
Construction:
- First candle
- any candle except the Four-Price Doji
- a candle in an uptrend or closing above the trendline
- Second candle
- any candle except the Four-Price Doji
- the candle's low above the previous candle's high
The Rising Window is classified as a bullish continuation pattern. Both pattern's lines can be any basic candles, appearing either as a long or as a short line. The only exception is the Four-Price Doji, which cannot appear as a part of the pattern.
Pattern is characterized by a price gap appearing between the first candle's high and the second candle's low.
Nison and Bulkowski in their books provide examples with a visible uptrend prior pattern occurrence what may be confusing. In our interpretation, for the Rising Window, it is enough that the first candle's closing price is located above the trendline, whereas the opening price may be placed below. The assumption that the Rising Window pattern requires a few candles in an uptrend, prior its occurrence, may lead to losing very significant signals.
Windows are known in western technical analysis and often are called as gaps. Classic interpretation says that after three occurrences of the Rising Window, trend may reverse. Very often, the Rising Window acts as a support.
Nison claims that when a Rising Window is preceded by a bullish reversal pattern, its reliability is greater. Our research also says that if the second candle of a Rising Window is formed at a high volume, its reliability is better.
Particular attention should be paid to the second candle of the pattern. A black candle or a doji candle may weaken the signal. The second line may be a part of other, conflicting pattern. Sometimes the Rising Window may be recognized at the same time also as the Bearish Doji Star or the Two-Candle Shooting Star. In such unclear situations, attention should be focused on the overall market context and the resistance/support lines.
A word of caution is needed for traders taking a position on the second line of the pattern. Namely, when the price gaps upward, the candle still can be closed lower producing a black body. Then instead of having a Rising Window we may have a bearish reversal pattern, for example, the Dark Cloud Cover or the Bearish Engulfing.
Please note that interpretation of the Rising Window adapted by CandleScanner is different than the one proposed by Bulkowski. Bulkowski claims that the Rising Window is composed of none candle lines because it is just a gap.
Either way, the most important matter is to be consistent. Therefore, when we present any statistics of the Rising Window, it is important to remember which interpretation is used, to compare apples to apples.
Rising Window statistics
Below you can find some Rising Window pattern statistics calculated by CandleScanner software. To see more detailed statistics, for other markets and periodicity try our CandleScanner software. Prices start at only $10, and you can see more detailed statistics, for other markets and periodicity. Click here to find out more!
Scanner settings: daily stocks
Group: S&P500
Number of symbols: 502
Date range: 7/1/1995 - 6/30/2015
Time interval: daily candles
Total number of candlesticks: 2,236,421
Number of occurrences (Rising Window): 36,612
Number of occurrences (all candlestick patterns): 638,570
% of occurrences (Rising Window): 5.73 %
Average frequency: 61.1
Efficiency statistics (5 candlesticks testing period)
Efficiency | NO DATA | FALSE | LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Occurrences |
6 | 7,124 | 10,823 | 7,099 | 11,560 |
% of Occurrences |
0.02 % | 19.44 % | 29.56 % | 19.39 % | 31.59 % |
Efficiency | NO DATA | FALSE | LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Occurrences |
58 | 6,689 | 8,444 | 6,006 | 15,415 |
% of Occurrences |
0.16 % | 18.11 % | 23.06 % | 16.40 % | 42.27 % |
Occurrences Statistics | 5 candlesticks testing period (HIGH efficiency) |
10 candlesticks testing period (HIGH efficiency) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | Number of Occurrences |
Average Frequency |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
URI | 74 | 59.6 | 39 | 52.71 % | 46 | 62.17 % |
LB | 75 | 67.1 | 35 | 46.67 % | 43 | 57.33 % |
EMC | 105 | 47.9 | 50 | 47.61 % | 59 | 56.18 % |
AGN | 86 | 58.5 | 35 | 40.69 % | 47 | 55.81 % |
CMI | 98 | 51.4 | 44 | 44.89 % | 54 | 55.10 % |
CTSH | 82 | 52.3 | 33 | 40.25 % | 45 | 54.88 % |
NOV | 119 | 39.5 | 56 | 47.05 % | 65 | 54.62 % |
PWR | 77 | 56.8 | 39 | 50.65 % | 42 | 54.55 % |
SWN | 81 | 62.1 | 40 | 49.38 % | 44 | 54.32 % |
GLW | 118 | 42.7 | 54 | 45.77 % | 64 | 54.24 % |
Occurrences Statistics | 5 candlesticks testing period (FALSE efficiency) |
10 candlesticks testing period (FALSE efficiency) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | Number of Occurrences |
Average Frequency |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
NTAP | 98 | 50.3 | 41 | 41.84 % | 41 | 41.84 % |
SWKS | 102 | 49.4 | 42 | 41.18 % | 42 | 41.18 % |
NVDA | 85 | 48.7 | 32 | 37.65 % | 32 | 37.65 % |
MCHP | 83 | 60.7 | 31 | 37.35 % | 30 | 36.14 % |
AMAT | 96 | 52.4 | 32 | 33.33 % | 32 | 33.33 % |
LRCX | 81 | 62.1 | 27 | 33.33 % | 27 | 33.33 % |
XLNX | 93 | 54.1 | 31 | 33.33 % | 31 | 33.33 % |
KLAC | 86 | 58.5 | 29 | 33.72 % | 28 | 32.56 % |
ADI | 87 | 57.9 | 28 | 32.18 % | 28 | 32.18 % |
FFIV | 76 | 53.2 | 24 | 31.58 % | 24 | 31.58 % |
Scanner settings: daily stocks
Group: S&P500
Number of symbols: 502
Date range: 7/1/2010 - 6/30/2015
Time interval: daily candles
Total number of candlesticks: 614,034
Number of occurrences (Rising Window): 11,351
Number of occurrences (all candlestick patterns): 166,328
% of occurrences (Rising Window): 6.82 %
Average frequency: 54.1
Efficiency statistics (5 candlesticks testing period)
Efficiency | NO DATA | FALSE | LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Occurrences |
6 | 1,686 | 4,309 | 2,605 | 2,745 |
% of Occurrences |
0.05 % | 14.80 % | 37.96 % | 22.95 % | 24.24 % |
Efficiency | NO DATA | FALSE | LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Occurrences |
58 | 1,486 | 3,216 | 2,274 | 4,317 |
% of Occurrences |
0.51 % | 12.58 % | 28.33 % | 20.03 % | 38.55 % |
Occurrences Statistics | 5 candlesticks testing period (HIGH efficiency) |
10 candlesticks testing period (HIGH efficiency) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | Number of Occurrences |
Average Frequency |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
DAL | 29 | 43.4 | 18 | 62.07 % | 20 | 72.42 % |
CVC | 22 | 57.2 | 12 | 54.55 % | 15 | 68.18 % |
AGN | 25 | 50.3 | 10 | 40.00 % | 16 | 68.00 % |
VLO | 25 | 50.3 | 10 | 40.00 % | 16 | 68.00 % |
ORLY | 22 | 57.2 | 10 | 45.46 % | 14 | 63.63 % |
PHM | 22 | 57.2 | 13 | 59.09 % | 14 | 63.63 % |
CBG | 31 | 40.6 | 15 | 48.40 % | 19 | 61.29 % |
COH | 23 | 54.7 | 9 | 39.13 % | 14 | 60.87 % |
PH | 30 | 41.9 | 11 | 36.67 % | 18 | 60.00 % |
F | 27 | 46.6 | 12 | 44.44 % | 16 | 59.26 % |
Occurrences Statistics | 5 candlesticks testing period (FALSE efficiency) |
10 candlesticks testing period (FALSE efficiency) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | Number of Occurrences |
Average Frequency |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
Number of Occurrences |
% of Occurrences |
GMCR | 25 | 50.3 | 11 | 44.00 % | 11 | 44.00 % |
FSLR | 25 | 50.3 | 10 | 40.00 % | 10 | 40.00 % |
CSC | 26 | 48.4 | 11 | 42.31 % | 10 | 38.46 % |
RL | 28 | 44.9 | 10 | 35.71 % | 9 | 32.14 % |
FIS | 22 | 57.2 | 9 | 40.91 % | 7 | 31.82 % |
HPQ | 23 | 54.7 | 7 | 30.43 % | 7 | 30.43 % |
RIG | 27 | 46.6 | 8 | 29.63 % | 8 | 29.63 % |
WHR | 24 | 52.4 | 7 | 29.17 % | 7 | 29.17 % |
AIV | 22 | 57.2 | 6 | 27.27 % | 6 | 27.27 % |
PNC | 26 | 48.4 | 7 | 26.92 % | 7 | 26.92 % |